Category: all

So today I headed to home depot. In the decking aisle I obtained a 42x36" piece of glass designed to be a railing. I purchased a pair of 2x4" w/ a groove cut as well.

I then bodged these together, somewhat like below. I took a LED light strip and wrapped it around the glass (facing in).

The results, well this is a first test video w/o cleaning it or tuning the camera. But i think it shows promise. What do you think?

 

 

 

The CBC did a good job of explaining the phases and restrictions. In a nutshell, as of December 19, 2019, Telco in Canada must either block invalid caller ID numbers (e.g. ones that are not dialable), or, provide the user some filtering options.

Now, this will be unlikely to make much difference. The spammers just spoof the caller ID to be a real number to get around this. What we really need is BCP38, a tool from the IP world where I accept a packet from your only if the source IP is one I would route back to you.

There is another phase coming, a sort of verification of networks approach, somewhat along the lines of BCP38, that comes online by Sept 30, 2020. Will that stop them? No. The only thing that will stop the scammers is destroying the risk:reward ratio. We must increase their risk (getting arrested, fined, going to jail, etc), and lower their reward (less people fall for the scam).

On the first, this is an enforcement issue. On the second, its an education issue as much as a technology one. If you each explain to a few friends that "no one takes payment in Apple iTunes cards" and some of the other common features of the scam, and if those friends explain to a few, this inoculates the population. Herd immunity.

I suppose we could also introduce a system where every phone call was a callback: you call me, my phone sees your caller ID, and calls you back. This would guarantee the system, and make the enforcement much simpler (but still not perfect).

As for a better sort of punishment for those caught, how about we develop a method to surgically implant taste-buds in their sphincter's? Who's with me on that!

Let me introduce you to Legal Linda. I met her on a lawyers site. Our relationship is either purely professional, or non-existent, depending on how you view it.

Legal Linda assures me that she is artificially intelligent (no word on the certified Turing test results). But she also reminds me that I don't have an attorney-client privilege with her.

Now, I had not considered I would... But now I am wondering... how long before me and Internet-enabled-Chatty-Kathy could be considered to be in a attorney-client relationship? Would her algorithm have to pass the bar exam? If it did, could it be licensed into all sorts of products I use (gmail etc) to render them subpoena-proof?

You are welcome.

https://www.google.com/search?q=92d278e671f32a9ee4a3c0668e46a41f4a3b74b0&oq=92d278e671f32a9ee4a3c0668e46a41f4a3b74b0

My new projector is giving me some weird life choices. Should I enjoy now?  Or give up welfare? Vote in the poll below!

 

Should I...

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...